For updates about the lack of updates:
click
click
click
.
Early, but this is my insightful post of the year (by 'Causality'):
... people are often rather eager to excuse and defend
incompetent users out of some misguided sympathy for them. Real
compassion for them would mean teaching, explaining, and
providing good references for their edification. It would not
mean excusing their failures or sugarcoating their incompetence.
Any literate adult can achieve competency with a computer, and
most problems that make the network a worse place for everyone
directly involve users who lack knowledge, so why the "get off
your high horse" spite towards those who expect better?
If anything, I think the "high horse" is the belief that
users will always be ignorant, will always be victims of these
security issues, and can never overcome them. It is not the
belief that they can and should overcome them.
http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1575094&cid=31402934
Hognoxious's followup provides an important clarification:
Not knowing isn't stupid. It's ignorant, and that can be cured. Refusing
to know, even when you've been (repeatedly) told - now that's stupid.
Another from Baxxter:
A driver should be aware of their fuel economy, but it's more
likely the job of a specialist to determine why the fuel economy
has changed. Knowing if the difference is due to the air
filter/oil filter/radiator/spark plug/exhaust/fuel filter, or
any of the other parts which could cause this problem is
generally left to someone knowledgeable. The end-user should
only be expected to notice the issue and request help...
Generated Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:55:47 +1000
Copyright © 2002-2010 Dylan Leigh.
[HTML 4.01 Transitional]